Cragg, L., Gilmore,
C. Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development
of mathematics proficiency. Trends in
Neuroscience and Education (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001i
Background:
An understanding
of the mechanisms underlying the processes involved in learning and performing
mathematics is essential in order to improve mathematics achievement. Currently
21% of 11-year-olds exit primary school without reaching a developmentally
appropriate mathematics level, and 5% fail to achieve numeracy skills expected
from a 7-year-old. Additionally, about 20% of adults have numeracy skills that fall
below that which is required for everyday situations. Aside from factors such
as attitude; motivation; language ability; IQ, and social and educational
factors; executive function cognitive skills are related to mathematics
performance.
Purpose:
To review the
existing body of literature and to synthesize current knowledge about executive
function skills relative to mathematics performance as well as identify questions for
future research.
Definitions:
Executive
Function Skills – skills required to monitor and control thought and action;
Working Memory – skill of holding and manipulating information in mind;
Inhibition – ability to suppress distracting information and unwanted
responses; Shifting – ability to flexibly switch attention between different
tasks
Key Points:
Studies suggest
that children with mathematics disabilities have difficulty with central
executive components of working memory, specifically when numerical information
such as digit span is involved. While working memory is known to predict
mathematics performance, the relationship requires further investigation. Studies
also suggest that inhibitory control predicts mathematics performance, but the
body of literature is limited. Shifting abilities’ impact on mathematics is
unclear although one study found it to be a predictor of mathematics
performance.
The impact of
executive function on mathematics performance is complex. Studies suggest that
different mathematics components rely on different sets of executive function
skills. For instance, working memory was found to be relation to fraction
computation, but not a predictor of the conceptual understanding of fractions.
Also, inhibition has been linked to the application of additive concepts.
Children appear
to rely on executive function skills at different extents depending on
developmental age in mathematics performance. They also appear to differ from
adults in their reliance on working memory when solving arithmetic problems.
These findings possibly suggest the use of different arithmetic strategies,
such as retrieval, counting, and decomposition; and less automatic processing
resources.
Some studies
have examined executive function skills relative to the learning of new
mathematical material. They have shown that executive function skills predict
mathematics performance in subsequent years. Some studies have also examined
the role of training in mathematics learning. Training has been found to lead
to an improvement in working memory skills and mental arithmetic, but has no
impact on mathematics achievement. Other studies found that domain-specific
training improved counting skills.
Conclusions:
The mechanisms
of executive function skills that support the acquisition and skilled
application of mathematics remain uncertain. The integration of both
domain-general and domain-specific skills in theoretical frameworks about the
development of mathematics proficiency is necessary. Further research is needed
to better predict the relationships between the executive function skills:
working memory, inhibition, and shifting; and the components of mathematical
knowledge: facts, procedures, and concepts. These components also need to be
investigated in different age groups.
Implications:
Overall, the
studies presented suggest that children’s executive function skills predict
their mathematics performance and impact their ability to learn new
mathematical material. These findings cannot yet be generalized in a way that
extends directly into the classroom setting. There is a strong need for further
investigation in these areas in order to inform and influence classroom
practice.
Questions Raised:
Do children differ from adults in
their reliance on working memory when utilizing the same arithmetic strategies,
or do they use different arithmetic strategies altogether?
No comments:
Post a Comment